|
WORKS /
WORKS.ReportCard HistoryHide minor edits - Show changes to markup February 23, 2011, at 05:27 AM
by
- Changed lines 7-20 from:
to:
This installation comprises all the report cards I received at school from age 7 to 15 (from 1973 to 1982). Without altering anything in the cards, I exhibited them at an exhibition as an aggregate or survey of grades and ranking. The cumulative data could be analyzed as an academic estimation of my formative years. These numbers and averages reflect how teachers had judged my performance at school and represent authorized evaluations of both my aptitude and attitude. Through tests deemed standardized, they are objective summations of my capacity as a student. However, the objective becomes dependent on the subjective, i.e. the value and meaning of these numbers are subject to the significance variably mandated by parents according to their own sets of values. Parents have varying degrees of being particular about grades. These numbers could mean eliciting either pride or shame. In any case, report cards are a common experience and usually kept private and confidential even as they determine negative or positive values that they assign to students. Rendering my report cards exposed to the public in the spirit of a kind of defiance gave me a chance to observe/watch people respond to these evaluations. Their responses reveal their own values. Deleted line 13:
Added line 20:
Changed lines 41-44 from:
This installation comprises all the report cards I received at school from age 7 to 15 (from 1973 to 1982). Without altering anything in the cards, I exhibited them at an exhibition as an aggregate or survey of grades and ranking. The cumulative data could be analyzed as an academic estimation of my formative years. These numbers and averages reflect how teachers had judged my performance at school and represent authorized evaluations of both my aptitude and attitude. Through tests deemed standardized, they are objective summations of my capacity as a student. However, the objective becomes dependent on the subjective, i.e. the value and meaning of these numbers are subject to the significance variably mandated by parents according to their own sets of values. Parents have varying degrees of being particular about grades. These numbers could mean eliciting either pride or shame. In any case, report cards are a common experience and usually kept private and confidential even as they determine negative or positive values that they assign to students. Rendering my report cards exposed to the public in the spirit of a kind of defiance gave me a chance to observe/watch people respond to these evaluations. Their responses reveal their own values.\\ \\ to:
This installation comprises all the report cards I received at school from age 7 to 15 (from 1973 to 1982). Without altering anything in the cards, I exhibited them at an exhibition as an aggregate or survey of grades and ranking. The cumulative data could be analyzed as an academic estimation of my formative years. These numbers and averages reflect how teachers had judged my performance at school and represent authorized evaluations of both my aptitude and attitude. Through tests deemed standardized, they are objective summations of my capacity as a student. However, the objective becomes dependent on the subjective, i.e. the value and meaning of these numbers are subject to the significance variably mandated by parents according to their own sets of values. Parents have varying degrees of being particular about grades. These numbers could mean eliciting either pride or shame. In any case, report cards are a common experience and usually kept private and confidential even as they determine negative or positive values that they assign to students. Rendering my report cards exposed to the public in the spirit of a kind of defiance gave me a chance to observe/watch people respond to these evaluations. Their responses reveal their own values. Deleted lines 44-45:
\\ Added line 50:
Deleted lines 52-54:
Deleted lines 58-77:
Changed lines 61-154 from:
to:
February 23, 2011, at 05:17 AM
by
- Added lines 7-18:
Added lines 77-192:
February 23, 2011, at 05:17 AM
by
- Changed line 7 from:
This installation comprises all the report cards I received at school from age 7 to 15 (from 1973 to 1982). Without altering anything in the cards, I exhibited them at an exhibition as an aggregate or survey of grades and ranking. The cumulative data could be analyzed as an academic estimation of my formative years. These numbers and averages reflect how teachers had judged my performance at school and represent authorized evaluations of both my aptitude and attitude. Through tests deemed standardized, they are objective summations of my capacity as a student. However, the objective becomes dependent on the subjective, i.e. the value and meaning of these numbers are subject to the significance variably mandated by parents according to their own sets of values. Parents have varying degrees of being particular about grades. These numbers could mean eliciting either pride or shame. In any case, report cards are a common experience and usually kept private and confidential even as they determine negative or positive values that they assign to students. Rendering my report cards exposed to the public in the spirit of a kind of defiance gave me a chance to observe/watch people respond to these evaluations. Their responses reveal their own values. to:
This installation comprises all the report cards I received at school from age 7 to 15 (from 1973 to 1982). Without altering anything in the cards, I exhibited them at an exhibition as an aggregate or survey of grades and ranking. The cumulative data could be analyzed as an academic estimation of my formative years. These numbers and averages reflect how teachers had judged my performance at school and represent authorized evaluations of both my aptitude and attitude. Through tests deemed standardized, they are objective summations of my capacity as a student. However, the objective becomes dependent on the subjective, i.e. the value and meaning of these numbers are subject to the significance variably mandated by parents according to their own sets of values. Parents have varying degrees of being particular about grades. These numbers could mean eliciting either pride or shame. In any case, report cards are a common experience and usually kept private and confidential even as they determine negative or positive values that they assign to students. Rendering my report cards exposed to the public in the spirit of a kind of defiance gave me a chance to observe/watch people respond to these evaluations. Their responses reveal their own values.\\ Changed line 43 from:
This installation comprises all the report cards I received at school from age 7 to 15 (from 1973 to 1982). Without altering anything in the cards, I exhibited them at an exhibition as an aggregate or survey of grades and ranking. The cumulative data could be analyzed as an academic estimation of my formative years. These numbers and averages reflect how teachers had judged my performance at school and represent authorized evaluations of both my aptitude and attitude. Through tests deemed standardized, they are objective summations of my capacity as a student. However, the objective becomes dependent on the subjective, i.e. the value and meaning of these numbers are subject to the significance variably mandated by parents according to their own sets of values. Parents have varying degrees of being particular about grades. These numbers could mean eliciting either pride or shame. In any case, report cards are a common experience and usually kept private and confidential even as they determine negative or positive values that they assign to students. Rendering my report cards exposed to the public in the spirit of a kind of defiance gave me a chance to observe/watch people respond to these evaluations. Their responses reveal their own values. to:
This installation comprises all the report cards I received at school from age 7 to 15 (from 1973 to 1982). Without altering anything in the cards, I exhibited them at an exhibition as an aggregate or survey of grades and ranking. The cumulative data could be analyzed as an academic estimation of my formative years. These numbers and averages reflect how teachers had judged my performance at school and represent authorized evaluations of both my aptitude and attitude. Through tests deemed standardized, they are objective summations of my capacity as a student. However, the objective becomes dependent on the subjective, i.e. the value and meaning of these numbers are subject to the significance variably mandated by parents according to their own sets of values. Parents have varying degrees of being particular about grades. These numbers could mean eliciting either pride or shame. In any case, report cards are a common experience and usually kept private and confidential even as they determine negative or positive values that they assign to students. Rendering my report cards exposed to the public in the spirit of a kind of defiance gave me a chance to observe/watch people respond to these evaluations. Their responses reveal their own values.\\ February 23, 2011, at 05:16 AM
by
- Changed lines 7-10 from:
to:
This installation comprises all the report cards I received at school from age 7 to 15 (from 1973 to 1982). Without altering anything in the cards, I exhibited them at an exhibition as an aggregate or survey of grades and ranking. The cumulative data could be analyzed as an academic estimation of my formative years. These numbers and averages reflect how teachers had judged my performance at school and represent authorized evaluations of both my aptitude and attitude. Through tests deemed standardized, they are objective summations of my capacity as a student. However, the objective becomes dependent on the subjective, i.e. the value and meaning of these numbers are subject to the significance variably mandated by parents according to their own sets of values. Parents have varying degrees of being particular about grades. These numbers could mean eliciting either pride or shame. In any case, report cards are a common experience and usually kept private and confidential even as they determine negative or positive values that they assign to students. Rendering my report cards exposed to the public in the spirit of a kind of defiance gave me a chance to observe/watch people respond to these evaluations. Their responses reveal their own values. Added lines 9-15:
These report cards are a form of commentary on the acceptance of art in our society. Art typically resists authority as its precepts dictate defying norms and embracing complexity. But in reality, Art is also subject to the appraisal and judgment of others and such evaluation fluctuates through time and depends on differing points of view. Art is not just what is seen but how it is seen and judged by others. Marcel Duchamp: “Art is not about itself but the attention that we bring to it.” \\ Changed line 17 from:
\\\ to:
\\ Changed line 19 from:
\\\ to:
\\ Deleted line 20:
\\\ Changed line 25 from:
Copyright © 2009 TOYOSHIMA Yasuko. All rights reserved.\\ to:
Copyright © 2011 TOYOSHIMA Yasuko. All rights reserved.\\ Changed lines 43-44 from:
This work of art is an installation, which consists of original, personal report cards I received while I was under compulsory education, when I was a school child from 7 years old to 15 years old (from 1973 to 1982). to:
This installation comprises all the report cards I received at school from age 7 to 15 (from 1973 to 1982). Without altering anything in the cards, I exhibited them at an exhibition as an aggregate or survey of grades and ranking. The cumulative data could be analyzed as an academic estimation of my formative years. These numbers and averages reflect how teachers had judged my performance at school and represent authorized evaluations of both my aptitude and attitude. Through tests deemed standardized, they are objective summations of my capacity as a student. However, the objective becomes dependent on the subjective, i.e. the value and meaning of these numbers are subject to the significance variably mandated by parents according to their own sets of values. Parents have varying degrees of being particular about grades. These numbers could mean eliciting either pride or shame. In any case, report cards are a common experience and usually kept private and confidential even as they determine negative or positive values that they assign to students. Rendering my report cards exposed to the public in the spirit of a kind of defiance gave me a chance to observe/watch people respond to these evaluations. Their responses reveal their own values. Changed lines 45-47 from:
At schools in Japan, the teachers hand 'report-cards' over to each of their students / their parents at the end of every semester.\\ to:
These report cards are a form of commentary on the acceptance of art in our society. Art typically resists authority as its precepts dictate defying norms and embracing complexity. But in reality, Art is also subject to the appraisal and judgment of others and such evaluation fluctuates through time and depends on differing points of view. Art is not just what is seen but how it is seen and judged by others. Marcel Duchamp: “Art is not about itself but the attention that we bring to it.” Changed line 50 from:
\\\ to:
\\ Changed line 52 from:
\\\ to:
\\ Deleted lines 53-54:
Changed lines 55-56 from:
The report card contained highly secret personal information for children and the family. On the other hand of course, their value and meaning is different depending on the family's policy, and their viewpoint of their values. Some of them would not care at all regardless of the result. It is also said that their reaction upon receiving the report card would be different dependant on the result; they would be proud of it or would be ashamed of it. to:
Changed lines 58-70 from:
The report card case is similar to the acceptance of ART in our society and its surroundings.
to:
Changed line 61 from:
Copyright © 2009 TOYOSHIMA Yasuko. All rights reserved.\\ to:
Copyright © 2011 TOYOSHIMA Yasuko. All rights reserved.\\ April 12, 2010, at 11:29 AM
by
- Changed line 40 from:
This work of art is an installation, which consists of original, personal report cards I received while I was under compulsory education, when I was a school child from 7 years old to 15 years old (from 1973 to 1982). to:
This work of art is an installation, which consists of original, personal report cards I received while I was under compulsory education, when I was a school child from 7 years old to 15 years old (from 1973 to 1982). \\ April 12, 2010, at 11:28 AM
by
- Changed line 40 from:
This work of art is an installation, which consists of original, personal report cards I received while I was under compulsory education, when I was a school child from 7 years old to 15 years old (from 1973 to 1982).\\ to:
This work of art is an installation, which consists of original, personal report cards I received while I was under compulsory education, when I was a school child from 7 years old to 15 years old (from 1973 to 1982). April 12, 2010, at 11:02 AM
by
- Changed lines 5-9 from:
通知表 (1998-) to:
通知表(1998-) \\ Changed lines 18-22 from:
to:
Changed lines 24-29 from:
to:
Changed lines 34-39 from:
Report Card (1998-) to:
Report Card (1998-) This work of art is an installation, which consists of original, personal report cards I received while I was under compulsory education, when I was a school child from 7 years old to 15 years old (from 1973 to 1982).\\
I exhibited them on the wall simply at an art 'Exhibition', without changing anything about them. Changed lines 51-53 from:
to:
The students are rated by their teachers on how mach they could understand and how goodly or badly they performed in class. The teacher has to judge them on the result of some kind of test and their attitude.\\ It became an authorized evaluation of the student. It became an objective view for the student.
Changed lines 74-77 from:
to:
April 09, 2010, at 06:08 PM
by
- Changed lines 1-2 from:
to:
April 09, 2010, at 06:07 PM
by
- Changed lines 8-9 from:
\\ to:
Deleted line 32:
Changed lines 35-37 from:
\\ to:
April 09, 2010, at 06:06 PM
by
- Added line 7:
Added line 32:
April 09, 2010, at 06:06 PM
by
- Deleted line 2:
Deleted line 6:
Deleted lines 30-31:
Deleted line 32:
April 09, 2010, at 06:05 PM
by
- Changed lines 6-8 from:
通知表 Report Card (1998-) to:
通知表 (1998-) April 09, 2010, at 06:05 PM
by
- Deleted line 5:
Changed lines 17-20 from:
to:
Changed lines 29-30 from:
to:
April 09, 2010, at 06:04 PM
by - April 09, 2010, at 06:03 PM
by
- Added lines 34-35:
April 09, 2010, at 06:03 PM
by
- Changed lines 28-30 from:
to:
April 09, 2010, at 06:03 PM
by
- Changed lines 7-9 from:
通知表 Score Card (1998-) to:
通知表 Report Card (1998-) Changed lines 33-35 from:
Score Card (1998-) to:
Report Card (1998-) April 09, 2010, at 06:02 PM
by
- Added lines 26-27:
Changed lines 53-54 from:
to:
April 09, 2010, at 06:01 PM
by
- Added lines 21-28:
Added lines 42-48:
February 20, 2009, at 11:11 PM
by
- Changed lines 20-23 from:
to:
February 20, 2009, at 11:11 PM
by
- Added lines 1-9:
Deleted lines 10-11:
通知表 Score Card (1998-) Changed lines 23-24 from:
to:
Added lines 25-36:
December 23, 2008, at 09:35 PM
by
- Changed lines 14-15 from:
to:
April 27, 2008, at 08:04 PM
by
- Added lines 1-22:
|
|